You can say it till you're blue in the face, but the facts don't support you whatsoever. cease-fire and bring political stability. Bush accepted those terms when he agreed to send 25,000 troops to Somalia. And failed to keep his own word promising to return them by Clinton's inauguration. He knew what he was getting in to and by lying about his motives, he was absolving himself of any future blame. I guess some fell for it.
Clinton didn't take sides.... the UN was hunting down a criminal that liquidateed those Pakistani soldiers. As soon as you understand the difference between UN and US, the sooner you'll become educated.
What part of "On May, 1993, the UN officially took control and responsibility for operations in Somalia" do you not comprehend?
Bush WAS doing the right thing: delivering aid via the US military for the first few months. Then he got too ambitious and sent 25,000 US troops as peacekeepers. The beginning of the disaster.
"On May, 1993, the UN officially took control and responsibility for operations in Somalia." I thought Kofi Annan was the secretary-general of UN, not Clinton.
It's not about who has the last words. It's about FACTS and how you are completely ignorant of it. Your neo-con opinions are NOT facts, as I've proven over and over again.
For a country that supposedly "doesn't care to" sure does try hard. 10,000+ border patrols, $100M budget, $5 million spent on motion detectors alone. Of course, Bush has cut spending on BPs, because he wants more illegals to enter the country so he can grant them amnesty and voting power, even to persons.
Here's an interesting tidbit I found: "The Bush Administration has outsourced $30 million in US taxpayer dollars to firms in Mexico to produce the US Customs and Border Patrol's new uniforms."
"Weak" countries are no longer "weak" when they possess nuclear weapons.
Since Reeve is dead, he would be defenseless.
Pakistan is NOT a "weak" country by any means. Ask the Indians.
What this loon doesn't know, is that the Pakistani-Afghani border is approximately 2,250 miles long. It's impossible to guard every inch of the border. Yet, there's no threat of invasion because of treacherous mountain terrain. Just because a few Al-Qaeda members may be hiding in the caves doesn't make the border "unsecure." Plus, no one would dare invade Pakistan, because they are armed with nuclear weapons.
Except for the fact that Iraq was castrated by UN sanctions and inspections and posed no threat to anyone.
Except for the fact that Saddam didn't sponsor any person organizations. Other than that you are factually correct.
In other words, you have nothing to dispute any of my factually backed points. Your losses keep mounting like US casualties in Iraq.
It's racist to site "dried squid" as their only export. Their $1.2 BILLION in exports may contain "dried squid" but it's hardly their main export.
It was racist to site "dried squid" as their only export. Their $1.2 BILLION in export begs to differ.
neo-con and racist are not mutally inclusive. But in your case, it appears to be.
"Dried squid" is a racist term when used to describe a $1.2 BILLION economy.
Um, no. Much of Western Europe remained status quo.
What humanitarian disaster? Yeah, loon, I'm asking you to cite your source.
A country supposedly suffering from humanitarian disaster doesn't send humanitarian aid all over the world, including victims of Katrina.
Take some much needed history, political and economics clbuttes.
