Bloody joke. uU|G*dfHK8Zr48


I merely call a space a spade. What is said was unambiguous. Variable speed limits don't cut congestion scott" wrote in message You are making the mistake of buttuming that the cars have no length. Cars of no length, 2 seconds apart, they... No, it's a standard game on u.r.d. It doesn't matter what the topic is, as soon as anyone makes any claim that something is so, it is always met with cries of "proof!" and "evidence". It doesn't matter how many times it has been show to be the case in the past, the claimant is always required to dig through the last ten years posts to find the "evidence". He's a hypocritical f*wit who decries people for breaking the law or choosing which they obey yet sees fit to do precisely that himself. In addition to that he has been proved wrong several times in arguments recently and when challenged to admit his error he simply ignores it. He has NEVER, as long as I have been reading this group admitted that he is wrong no matter how many times it has been proved and that makes him a spineless needle. I haven't lost anything. If you don't like it you can either use a killfile or f* off yourself. -- "There are no such useless words as, 'I didn't have a chance.'" Driving, HMSO There but for the grace of select favourite deity go I Lack of intent. Unless criminal negligence can be proven, ie drink, drugs, mbuttively excessive speed, etc...