I suppose "pre-emptive action" means something different when a democrat says it. Ahh such is the US political landscape where the people of one side see their people as angels and those of the other as devils, meanwhile both are doing the same thing for all effective purposes. D or R in office in 2003, the USA was going to invade iraq.
Like I do? Ds and Rs are beholden to the interests that give them money. They pander for votes by taking from one US citizen to give to another. They both take property from citizens to give it to private corporations to develop. Neither party will secure the borders because that means they can't pander for votes nor please the companies that employ illegal immigrants. Both parties use a variety of excuses to take our liberty and defend corporate profits. Everything from the patriot acts to DMCA.
Democrat supporters think it's ok to lose their liberty for the environment, helping the poor, taking away fire arms, and whole host of other things. Republican supporters don't mind the war on drugs, the war on terror, etc and so forth. Both parties use fear extensively.
As someone who doesn't see any excuse worth losing liberty for, exactly how are these two so-called parties any different? What sets them apart other than the excuses they use to expand government's power over the people?
Bushamerica $3 gas is here NOW 4736No it doesn't. It means these people treat us like idiots who can't remember what they said before. The events of 9-11-2001 gave government the excuse it was looking...
I believe that we have ONE party in this country effectively. See above.
See above. I guess "pre-emptive action" means something different when a democrat says it. When a republican says it, it meant excatly that.
