(Brent P)
Apparently, since Clinton did NOT attack, invade, and occupy Iraq, it does mean something different. You think?
As for your pretense that the US was going to rape Iraq no matter what, you're going to have to do better than that.
As so your defence boils down do: the US did it because the US is hopelessly corrupt. I don't think that's a real valid reason to start doing cheap Hitler imitations. More phony equivalance. You're quite good at that, aren't you?
Do you have a right to pollute? Do you have a right to demand that weapons be provided for persons and paranoid schizophrenics? Do you have that "host of things" handy?
Ah. So you basically are arguing that it's ok for Putsch to act like a scumbag, because all American are scumbags. Do I have that correctly?
No particular argument there, but it doesn't excuse why YOU support the occupation of Iraq.
Yeah, Hitler was pretty direct, too.
-
"Bonds are not money" Linder, trying to explain why the trust fund he says doesn't exist doesn't exist. Not dead, in jail, or a slave? Thank a liberal! Pay your taxes so the rich don't have to. For the finest in liberal-leftist commentary, For news feed (free, 10-20 articles a day) For essays (donations accepted, 2 articles-week)