On Tue, 21 Feb 2006 20:58:46 -0800, Timberwoof
Faster than usual. Well let me see, approximately 10 to 20,000 years ago, we began the warming portion of the 100,000 ice age cycle. So, if you are suggesting that it might be a little warmer than last year, I reply so what. If you say it might be a little warmer than 100 years ago, I say of course it is due to the ice age cycle. If you say it is warmer than 1000 years ago I tell you that I think you are a f***ing retarded moron.
How large were the glaciers 100,000 years ago at the same point in the cycle? Oh that's right, you have no f***ing clue.
Yes, that's right. I have enough intelligence to know that if you don't "do your science right", whatever the f*** that means, then yes, your conclusions are irrelevant and not something I will buy into. Further, there is NO DATA that supports this. You can't measure the last 100 years, ignore the fact that the cycle of global warming and cooling is 100,000 years long, and make stupid predictions based on your stupid pseudo science.
I never said that. I said the GW theory is bullpoo.
Plenty of people have theories that are accepted by scholars, and only a few have theories accepted by retards. Guess which group you fall into.
************************* Dave
