proffsl
Its value to your argument is what's degraded. Nowhere is the mode of travel discussed. And this is the sophistry upon which your whole argument rests.
That and non-legal interpretations of the words contained in the ruling.
Get out Black's Law and learn a thing or two.
Only through tortured logic does this imply any right to drive.
Black's Law dictionary. Get it, use it.
Strawman. I didn't say anything about regulations.
But that's a good point - this so-called "right" is restricted in various ways no matter if it really exists or not.
Learn how to read.
No help or wrong help for Detroit 3966Whatever thread that you found yourself in a logical dead in was something I've long since forgotten, so your childish personal sniping really seems funny. But for those that...
This implies you know the intent. If that's your claim, then you are a liar.
LOL. That's what the ruling is about. The whole thing is only tangentially about travel.
snip
And not one of them claims a right exists to any particular mode of transportation. That's *your* sophistry.
It is a direct answer. That's *your* interpretation, and I can see that plainly. I reject your interpretation as specious.
Where is the mode of locomotion defined? Hmmm?
In your pointy head only, so it seems.
Bzzzt. Almost any trade requires some sort of state certificate or license. Usually to demonstrate knowledge of rules or proficiency in the trade. This is verify to others that you can actually do what you say you can do.
Driving is exactly the same. Except for the fact that the standards are ridiculously low.
Which does not equal a right to drive.
Bzzzt - wrong again.
Strawman. Replace "must" with "may" and you are closer to my position.
Licenses restrict any number of potentially hazardous drivers from the roads, including children.
No help or wrong help for Detroit 3965Yes, that happened in the 80's most certainly. On one hand you had General Motors with the computer-controlled Varajet that the garden variety mechanic could not make head...
Bzzzt. Under your implied system, anything that can be used on a roadway for transportation should be able to be used. Lawn tractor, bulldozer, unicycle, etc.
Your rights end where my rights begin, and you driving drunk in a car with no lights and bald tires is not in the public's interest. (for example).
That is what licensing requirements are all about.
Glad to see you finally see it my way.
E.P.
