John David Galt
In terms of safety and responsibility, driver licensing offers nothing that didn't already exist without them.
Our public highways were intended to enhance our Right of Liberty. But, with the lie that driving is a privilege, the more our public highways are made unuseable by anything but the automobile, the more this lie makes us prisoners of privilege behind bars of blacktop.
Until citizens begin to realize the imposition upon their Liberty that driver licensing imposes, while offering absolutly nothing in terms of safety or responsibility that didn't already exist without them, bringing this issue before the courts would be like debating morality with the immoral. As long as the courts can keep the citizens hoodwinked, they'll continue to perpetrate this lie.
Citizens have been so brainwashed by the lies and propaganda, their actually afraid to even think of doing without it. They actually believe licensing serves a purpose which wouldn't exist without it. They have been so acclimated to the stench of licensing, they are afraid to do without it.
The hazards on our highways has very little to do with if a person CAN drive safely. Virtually everybody CAN drive safely. And, virtually everybody who CAN NOT drive safely wouldn't try to begin with because they wouldn't want to be held responsible for the consequences.
Driving is a Right 2541There are those among us, including representatives charged with protecting our Rights, who would use deception and lies to convince the readers that A Right OF Speech...
The problem is if they WILL drive safely. And, virtually everybody who WILL NOT drive safely, don't give a squat about the consequences to begin with, and would probably drive anyway, even without licenses. The ONLY thing that will stop this sort of person from driving is the bars of prison.
I challenge anyone to come up with a scenario where driver licensing offers any significant measure of safety or responsibility that didn't exist to begin with without licensing.
