You posted a Supreme Court ruling stating that we all have the right to travel freely. Beyond that, you've added your own interpretation of how that somehow translates into no need for drivers' licenses. Your one ruling, from about 100 years ago does not mean that our laws today are unconsbreastutional. They're used everyday.
If I witness someone recklessly endangering others, I take them straight to jail as required by the Texas Traffic Code under Reckless Driving which is a Clbutt B Misdemeanor. On top of that they'll be charged with the Clbutt C Misdemeanor of Driving Without a License.
What do you personally consider an official ID?
You have provided one ruling and your personal interpretation of it. That's not enough. I have shown you the Laws Which Say You Have To Be Licensed to Drive (I figured I'd follow your trend and capitalize my own words so that it looks official).
They're presumed innocent until they're found guilty of violating traffic law.
Do you have a driver's license?
Driving is a Right 2560jaybird What I posted is a Supreme Court ruling stating that we have the Right of Transit Ordinarily exercised for Personal Travel on our Public Highways. It just happens that State Driver Licensing...
-- --- jaybird --- I am not the cause of your problems. My actions are the result of your actions. Your life is not my fault.
