Ed Pirrero
What the hell is it with your obsession with names, or handles? In this context, they mean nothing, other than a handle used to identify participants in a dialog across an electronic medium where there would otherwise be no identifying characteristics. You could have identified yourself as "OneTwoThree", and it would mean nothing more or less than it does by identifying yourself as "Ed Pirrero". I have no idea if that really is your name. And, I couldn't care less. I could have identified myself as "Ed Washington", and you would have no idea if that really was my name. And again, it wouldn't make any difference. They are only a handles by which you we can address each other, and to which each of us would be able to respond.
Do you not see the Ad Hominem nature of your responces? You are far more interested in pbutting judgment on your imagined impression of myself, absolutly with out any supporting evidence, than you are in debating the issue, to which I have provided supporting evidence.
The quote I provided as evidence of my claim that we have the Right of Transit Ordinarily used for Personal Travel on our Public Highways says nothing about "commerce".
"Undoubtedly the right of locomotion, the right to remove from one place to another according to inclination, is an attribute of personal liberty, and the right, ordinarily, of free transit from or through the territory of any state is a right secured by the 14th Amendment and by other provisions of the Consbreastution." - Williams v. Fears, 179 U.S.
Not until other quotes pulled from elsewhere in the case does commerce come into play:
"These agents were engaged in hiring laborers in Georgia to be employed beyond the limits of the state. Of course, transportation must eventually take place as the result of such contracts, but it does not follow that the emigrant agent was engaged in transportation, or that the tax on his occupation was levied on transportation."
In this case, the defendant attempted to claim himself exempt from a Commerce Tax by claiming his Right of Transit. Given the quote I provided, and the other quote, The judged responded to the defendant, in effect, by saying: While there Undoubtedly exists a Right of Transit Ordinarily used for Personal Travel on our Public Highways, your activities are not Personal Travel but Interstate Commerce, and an Occupation Tax does not infringe on the Right of Transit Ordinarily used for Personal Travel on our Public Highways.
