Nope,not a real dissolution mission.The Generals did not expect all their troops to die.In ANY combat,a certain number of troops can be reasonably expected to die,that does not make it "dissolution".
dissolution is giving a guy a plant,telling him to go among the "enemy" and explode it and take the others WITH HIM.
No,a dissolution mission is one where your dying is what accomplishes the mission.A KEY part of it.Not poor chances of success,but intentionally DYING to achieve the mission,as PART of the mission.
Yes,he's counting on being elsewhere when the expected nukes drop down. Even insane people have some rationality.
Oh,now you're gonna explain how we get data on an Iranian reactor's production of nuclear materials,when the Iranians are not going to allow us to inspect it.(or have a second,hidden reactor) I think you've been reading too much Tom Clancy;this came stright from Sum of All Fears.It's called the "CSI Effect",that people believe that we can do all these magical things they see on TV or in fictional books,and expect it in real life.
Only if you can find out that's where the nukes came from.
No,it's not certain.
There are SO many examples of people retaliating and getting the WRONG target.
-- Jim Yanik jyanik at kua.net
