Nope, not to that particular claim of yours I chose to comment on.
Completely useless, as always with your desperate attempts to bullpoo your way out of your predicament.
Again, completely useless, as always with your desperate attempts to bullpoo your way out of your predicament.
Yes, really.
Couldnt bullpoo your way out of a wet paper bag even if your pathetic excuse for a 'life' depended on it.
Couldnt bullpoo your way out of a wet paper bag even if your pathetic excuse for a 'life' depended on it.
You get no say what so ever on anything at all. Ever.
Go and f*** yourself.
Lie, I never said that.
Irrelevant to that claim of yours being discussed in this subthread.
Never said they were. You did however make the claim that 'when a fuel has a higher knock resistance, the engine can wring more energy of it' and that is just plain wrong, most obviously with ethanol.
Lie.
Another lie. You ACTUALLY said 'when a fuel has a higher knock resistance, the engine can wring more energy of it'
Because 'when a fuel has a higher knock resistance, the engine can wring more energy of it' is just plain wrong.
I realise that may be a rather novel concept for you, but thats wrong anyway.
Irrelevant to that claim of yours that 'when a fuel has a higher knock resistance, the engine can wring more energy of it' being discussed in this subthread.
Irrelevant to that claim of yours that 'when a fuel has a higher knock resistance, the engine can wring more energy of it' being discussed in this subthread.
Go and f*** yourself.
Another lie. I have never ever said anything even remotely resembling anything like that.
Irrelevant to that claim of yours that 'when a fuel has a higher knock resistance, the engine can wring more energy of it' being discussed in this subthread.
