On Fri, 14 Oct 2005 02:26:50 +0100, Alistair J Murray
Of course.
But then I have NEVER suggested that you should do anything but fight it unless you were sure of your guilt.
You don't need to log the use of it.
If you didn't see the fixed camera or the van, or were not aware of the fact that you had pbutted it rather too fast, then you were not paying proper attention to your driving.
If you know you are guilty, then the fact that their evidence is "the contents of a sealed box" is totally irrelevant.
If you don't know you are guilty, then you do NOT accept the FPN without seeing the evidence first.
Why do you keep trying to make out your case based on things I have explicitly not said.
Nobody said you do.
But equally, you have no obligation to obstruct it.
And if you are likely to get a better result by not doing so AND YOU ARE SURE YOU ARE GUILTY, then I personally see no point in not taking it. -- Alex Heney, Global Villager Reality is a crutch for people who can't handle buttons To reply by email, my address is alexATheneyDOTplusDOTcom
