Again we are in agreement. I have no doubt you think you are far more intelligent than I. I do disagree however, it is not impolite for you to say so. I expect it and appreciate your living up to the standards I've come to anticipate.
Actually I've provided a great many supporting comments as to the validity of direct observations in such cases.
Not at all. The real trick is to remain civil and yet make absolutely clear what my opinions are. I'm particularly send at fooling poor readers into thinking I've been insulting.
The plural of anecdote is not data. Nor is repebreastion proof.
It is impossible for half the population so I would disagree with absolute mathematical certainty. The Lake Woebegone Effect.
No insult unless you are insecure about the claim. What is the statistic? Something like 80% of all drivers rate themselves above average?
Yeah. That would be one place. Oh wait. The NLLB don't exist. Hmmm, yet another fantasy paranoia instance.
You are not out. You can't help yourself. You think you are smarter, you think you are an above average driver, you think your observations are superior, you think I'm the one being nasty. It is all the same pathology that includes the inability to just walk away.
