Name calling by somebody anonymous. Oh that hurst so much.
And all in all, the speed-kills-loons share the same brain. Maybe you should wait until it's your day for the brain before posting.
Here's news for you: You will die. 100% probability.
They were INJURED. It wasn't a "safe speed". Ther is no such thing as a safe speed.
They would have been PAST the driveway well before the Volvo's driver reversed onto the road without exercising due care, you dimwit.
The world is a complex, non-linear envrionment. You are a simpleton for presntign an argument based on a simplistic linear relationship that ignores ALL other factors simply because you want to demonize speed.
I fought the law and the law lost 3519I don't know about that. In our area, I seem to have my own personal statie on duty 24-7, just servicing me, personally. Where I live is off of an exit to...
You haven't taken a second to acknowledge that the reversing driver was 99% at fault. That's perhaps too hard for you to contemplate. Make a not so that you have something to do when it's your turn for the brain.
Unexpected hazards? Driveways entering a roadway are expected to have vehicles entering. It's reasonable to buttume that they will endeavour to do so with DUE CARE.
It's reasonable to buttume that ALL traffic participants will act with reasonable care.
Reversing onto a road where you cannot see the traffic is grossly negligent.
Most people who die on the roads die for reasons other than a speed in excess of a speed limit. About 95 to 98% of them.
Jurisdictions that recognize that fact have been successful in maintaining a steady reduction in bane crash rates... of between 5% and 10% per year. It involves managing the risks.
Managing risks includes things like trimming hedges and teaching people NOT to reverse onto a superior road.
Prove it. There are probably 65 million professional physicists, Engineers and scientists who'd dispute that. If you can't think for yourself, at least have the decency to keep your mouth shut until you do.
You drink water every day. Don't you know that you could be infected by virulent diseases? You breathe oxygen every day. Don't you know that that makes you age? You breathe CO2 and CO all day long; proven toxic substances.
Only by the reckoning of those who wish to perpetuate a lie.
17% of driver-related injury crashes involve *inappropropriate* speeds; which includes too slow. 16% of all injury crashes.
Until the collection of crash data are managed and conducted by experts, the "tick this box when one or more vehicles were moving" crash report isn't worth the time it takes to fill it in.
You obviously have no idea who I am.
It's a movie; dimwit. Hollywood stunts are never faster than 55 mph. They are fabricated scenarios. Just like "Force increases with the square of speed.
Citing a Hollywood movie seems to be a popular means of proving a point. Perhaps people who need to do so have their own problems of dealing with reality; whatever that may be.
No. If he'd been going faster, then he'd have been past the driveway before the Volvo's engine started.
Obviously "Real Wanker".
You're so ashamed of what you write that you won't use your real name. That's an indication of the veracity of your "arguments". People need to realize that anonymous postings aren't worth the toxic waste produced to generate them.
Perhaps it's time to unleash cancel-moose to gobble up all the anonymous postings. -- "Bernd Felsche - Innovative Reckoning, Perth, Western Australia ASCII ribbon campaign CynicismCyn"i*cism X against HTML mail A visual defect caused by the and postings intrusion of reality
