Billy
Oh! Well, if that's all they do, there a waste of money and there's no use for them.
But, if they do more, there a Violation of Privacy, and there's no use for them.
Hahahahaha!!! If you don't know the meanings of words, you shouldn't debate them.
Marriam-Websters defines Locomotive as: "of or relating to travel" Marriam-Websters defines Locomotion as: "an act or the power of moving from place to place" Marriam-Websters defines Transit as: "an act, process, or instance of pbutting through or over"
There are many forms of Locomotion, or Transit, which may be used to accomplish travel, depending on which medium upon which one is traveling. Clearly though, not every form of Locomotion, or Transit, can be permitted, as some forms would obstruct or endanger the other travelers exercising their Right to the Locomotion Ordinarily used for Personal Travel, exercising their Right to the Transit Ordinarily used for Personal Travel. There must be a qualifier to limit the scope of Locomotion, or Transit, which may be used as a part of our Right.
I put no words into the court ruling. It is quoted EXACTLY as it appears in the ruling.
"Undoubtedly the right of locomotion, the right to remove from one place to another according to inclination, is an attribute of personal liberty, and the right, ordinarily, of free transit from or through the territory of any state is a right secured by the 14th Amendment and by other provisions of the Consbreastution." - Williams v. Fears, 179 U.S. 270 (1900) -
Note: "and the right, ordinarily, of free transit"
Clearly, the word "ordinarily" as it is used in that sentence functions as a qualifier to "transit".
