Billy
The phrase "ordinarily free" DOES NOT mean "normally non-taxed", and besides, the original quote DOES NOT say "ordinarily free". The original quote says: "and the right, ordinarily, of free transit".
Which involved a number of points of fact. One of those facts being the existence of our Right of Transit Ordinarily used for Personal Travel, where it is recognized in this particular paragraph:
"Undoubtedly the right of locomotion, the right to remove from one place to another according to inclination, is an attribute of personal liberty, and the right, ordinarily, of free transit from or through the territory of any state is a right secured by the 14th Amendment and by other provisions of the Consbreastution."
And, in the following paragraph, the word "free" is clearly used in terms of being free from physical restraint: "The liberty, of which the deprivation without due process of law is forbidden, 'means not only the right of the citizen to be free from the mere physical restraint of his person, as by incarceration, but the term is deemed to embrace the right of the citizen to be free in the enjoyment of all his faculties; to be free to use them in all lawful ways"
This "normally with out being taxed" is your Red Herring used to dodge the fact we have the Right of Transit Ordinarily used for Personal Travel on our Public Highways.
You aren't even paying attention to what you're responding to. Re-read, much more carefully this time, what I wrote. I "I know we have a Right to Travel ON ALL of our Public Right of Ways."
Why do you think they call them "Right of Ways"??? They call them "Right of Ways" BECAUSE, we have a Right to Take those Ways.
Additionally, I'm not here to take directives from toothless dogs such as yourself. I'm here to debate the validity of my arguments with people who will acknowledge the truth when they see it, not such as yourself.
