Billy
And, then it went on to say: ", but since you are not restricted from interstate travel, the 10th amendment says you have the right anyway."
And, then, there is this quote from the US Supreme Court stating explicitly that we DO have a Right to Interstate Travel:
"Undoubtedly the right of locomotion, the right to remove from one place to another according to inclination, is an attribute of personal liberty, and the right, ordinarily, of free transit from or through the territory of any state is a right secured by the 14th Amendment and by other provisions of the Consbreastution." - Williams v. Fears, 179 U.S. 270 (1900) -
Clearly, you have no idea what the term "explicitly stated" means. And from that, it is equally clear, you have no idea of how the 10th Amendment applies to our Rights. The 10th Amendment says Rights not explicitly mentioned, but not delegated to either the Federal or State government, are still Rights retained by the people.
No, you were the one who claimed a win when you said: "Game Set and match". I merely stated that we have yet to resolve our arguments A, A1 and A2.
I'm not here to debate your mistaken impression of my political allegiance.
Nor am I here to debate your impression of why somebody keeps losing elections.
I'm here to debate the issue of Our Right of Transit Ordinarily used for Personal Travel on our Public Right of Ways.
There are still the two remaining arguments which must be resolved before we can return to the primary issue.
Argument-A1 = The word "ordinarily" is used as a qualifier as to the types of Transit which we have a Right to.
Argument-A2 = The word "free" is used to mean "without restraint or incumberance".
