Wrong, it does not have to be "consbreastutionally delegated to the states
The 10th Amendment gives us nothing,
''The amendment states but a truism that all is retained which has not been surrendered. There is nothing in the history of its adoption to suggest that it was more than declaratory of the relationship between the national and state governments as it had been established by the Consbreastution before the amendment or that its purpose was other than to allay fears that the new national government might seek to exercise powers not granted, and that the states might not be able to exercise fully their reserved powers.''
No, no matter how many times you miss read this one judgment which was about a tax on hiring out of state worker and their right to go to other states without being taxed, they lost by the way, the tax was legal, the judge went on to say " in fine, we hold that the act does not conflict with the 14th amendment in the particulars named"
LOL he didnt even say "public Right of ways"
He did say public Highways, he said "transit from or through the territory " you made up the rest.
What property do you have the right to?
Read it sometime.
LOL, Pick us a thesaurus sometime and see if Obstruct is not a synonym for stop.
