sounding much like they were saying :
Indeed. And pbutting the buck to the road is going to be counter- productive in waking them up.
"Yeh, I had an accident this morning - on that dangerous bit of road, so it's not my fault."
Making idiots wake up will.
Fixing poorly designed roads will.
It won't reduce crashes.
"Improving" it? It doesn't EXIST.
Woah - I'm not glossing over the fact that badly designed roads exist, I'm stating that a road in and of itself is not dangerous. It's purely the way it's driven that is.
NIP arrived. 963sounding much like they were saying : 5-10%, perhaps. Yes, it does matter, if you want to correct it. Right. So you (or, more accurately, those whose job it is) DO and...
If a road was liable to give way suddenly underneath you in a landslide, no matter how carefully you drove over it, that WOULD be a dangerous road.
NIP arrived. uU|G*dfHK8Zr48 961Yes they are and that is precisely the point... which you are quite spectacularly failing to grasp. No, they don't. There is bad driving and badly engineered roads. When the two meet...
A road with poor sight-lines is NOT dangerous. It's purely the drivers who fail to take account of that fact that are dangerous.
If a road or junction is badly designed, then it should be improved. Often it's incredibly simple, like moving a sign, putting up a sign warning of a blind entrance, or even just trimming a hedge.
Sometimes, it's effectively physically impossible because of the location of buildings. In that case, your theory goes "Well, there's nothing can be done, it's dangerous. Boo hoo." Bollocks.
Stopping people driving on autopilot works in ALL scenarios.
If it makes f***wits THINK about their driving, then it has a benefit. Unlike saying "It's the road that's dangerous, not you", which has none.
