Rather obviously, it is best for the vehicle to travel at a speed that is neither inappropriately slow nor inappropriately fast. I also don't understand why the third vehicle's choice of an appropriate speed is affected by the first two vehicles.
The speed is not dangerous. I have travelled (briefly) at 134.2837654mph, many times. I have not yet died. Admittedly It wasn't in a "wheely chair" (a what?) -- it was in a rapidly accelerating plane.
snip
Not "safe to you" but "safe to all". Please explain what would be wrong if everyone drove at a speed which was safe to all others, at all times?
Obviously, it'd never happen. But neither does getting everyone to follow arbitrary haphazard speed limits.
If it's safe (which in some cases it is), why not?
You just want others to drive slowly, dont you?
Well, what are they?
Are they calculated based on something? Or made up based on how many people moan about drivers going "too fast"?
Pardon?
Er, you can tailgait at exactly the speed of the car in front.
I'm sure many people are shot at without "incident" (i.e. injury).
Does that make being shot at perfectly safe?
-- David Taylor
Police Speeding 839Dr Zoidberg a their True, but IMO he was not using the vehicle for police purposes at the time. He wasn't rushing to an emergency, he wasn't in pursuit of a suspect, all he...
