Daniel J. Stern
I am not going to debate who to blame for this entire debacle because the idea that any of us *really* know to blame at this point is far-fetched.
It wasn't *my* point to begin with. "MC Pee Pants" was the person who in the first place criticized Bush for staying in Texas too long. He basically said it didn't matter if he was working or masturbating, it would have been better for him to be in Washington.
Price of gas rising 13% a day 2316If they are going to justify a federal expenditure like that in one metropolitan area, then there are plenty of different types of similar-sized desired infrastructure projects that...
That's moronic. There is nothing of real substance that he could have been doing in Washington. It is just nothing but empty criticism that means nothing. Same with the people who criticized him for finishing reading the goat book to schoolchildren on 9-11. Do they really think that dropping the book and sprinting out of the school would mean a damn bit of difference? That is sound-bite politics at its worse.
The more appropriate debate regarding 9-11 is what the FBI knew and how is it going to fix the problem for the future. The more appropriate debate for this crisis is something similar. But I am sick and tired of needless, pointless criticisms (or praise) on both sides of the political spectrum for essentially substanceless points.
*You* were the one that took us off of that point I was making. *I* didn't start this debate. Figure that out before wasting my time with your posts next time.
Jon
