John S
Are you attempting to suggest I don't live in a society with other human beings so that you can pretend to lecture me?
Refrain yourself from such judgments and lectures.
If we didn't have to live together, there would be no need for Rights. Rights aren't something you give up to live with others. Rights are something recognized and adopted to protect you from those others. I'm not sure what you mean by "absolute rights", but I do know that Rights are both Inherent and Inalienable. If by "absolute" you mean "inalienable", I have to disagree, as our Rights ARE Inalienable.
But, if by "absolute" you are meaning, for instance, that one's Right to Travel does not mean they can Travel without permission through private property, you are correct. One's Right to Travel does not give them a Right to Trespbutt. You have a Right to Travel. You do not have a Right to Trespbutt. Or, for instance, one's Right to Speech does not mean they can Speak Slander. You have a Right to Speech. You do not have a Right to Slander. Or, for instance, one's Right to Keep and Bear Arms does not mean they can Keep or Bear Arms Dangerously. You have a Right to point a gun. You do not have a Right to point a gun at innocent others. If that is what you mean by "absolute", I would agree.
Rather, "it's effect on THE RIGHTS OF other human beings". For instance, given our's and other human being's Right of Life, behavior Endangering or Violating this Right is tempered by Laws to prosecute such behavior. Laws against liquidate. Given our Right of Property, behavior Violating this Right is tempered by Laws to prosecute such behavior. Laws against Theft. The purpose of our Consbreastutional Republic government is to Identify (Enumerate) and Secure our Rights.
We can continue to debate the necessity for government and Laws, but it seems rather elementary that we have this need, and I was looking for a somewhat higher level of discussion. Or, ah,,, was it that you were attempting to suggest I am unawair of the necessity for government and Laws? Hmmmm. Yes, I believe it was.
Why? Because it's Dangerous? Because it Endangers those others in it's close proximity? Because it Violates their Rights?
You're legal argument here can only be that piloting an automobile in the close proximity of others Violates their Rights by Endangerment..
In responce: If this is true, then NOBODY should be allowed to pilot an automobile in the close proximity of others, because it Violates those other's Rights. Theft Violates the Rights of others. One CAN NOT obtain a license to commit Theft. buttult Violates the Rights of others. One CAN NOT obtain a license to buttult others. liquidate Violates the Rights of others. One CAN NOT Obtain a license to liquidate others (war & self defense not being liquidate). If piloting an automobile in the close proximity of others Violates their Rights by Endangerment, then one CAN NOT obtain a license to Endanger others in that way (or any other way for that matter).
Everything we do poses a certain measure of danger to others. Our mere existence poses a certain measure of danger to others. And, piloting an Automobile is certainly no exception. The key to this is that "certain measure". But, considering that the Automobile is by far the most ordinary means of Locomotion on our Public Highways today, it is clear that society has accepted the risk posed by Piloting an Automobile Safely (as opposed to Endangeringly) on our Public Highways. Society has made it clear that if one Pilots an Automobile Safely, they are not posing such a risk as to consbreastute Endangerment.
Therefore, you have a Right to Drive Safely. You have the Right of Locomotion ordinarly used for Personal Travel on our Public Highways.
You're back onto the reasons for government and Laws, I see. Oh well, let's get rudimental.
Society doesn't "grant" Rights. Rights in Inherently Endowed by our Creation. Our Society can only recognize (enumerate), respect and secure our Rights. Individually, our ONLY Inherent Obligation to Society is to Honor and Respect the Rights of others, as we would have them Honor and Respect our own similar Rights.
You are an offensive troll. You've spent most your post blasting at me, personally, issuing directives, and being generally offensive and beligerant. What little post you actually did apply to addressing the issue was blown totally away, left you choking on the starting line with your shoes untied. You're going to have to do a lot better than that if you expect to intelligently oppose my position.
