I'll take that as a "no", you don't know what it is then 1. Nobody has ever said that the system is perfect, but is has stood against all criticism for 50 years now. It is as applicabale now as it was when Lord Cottenham first devised it.
Why? If you don't like it, or if you think there is something wrong with it then say what it is, why it is wrong and propose an alternative.
Road rage program on TV 1151I haven't yet over recorded the tape, so I had another look. There was a sign warning on the pavement that the...
Yes. I can think of no aspect of the system that is flawed in any way. It has stood the test of time for for road driving in all circumstances from touring to pursuit by all clbuttes of driver from complete novice to Police Clbutt 1 for 50 years.
Having said that, the system as defined in the original "Attention All Drivers" 2 and subsequent editions of Roadcraft is, at first glance, not the same as the system in the current edition of "new" Roadcraft. However, if you look at it properly and read the supporting text, in both the old and new editions, you will see that it is actually the same system. It is just that the explanation has been simplified, IMO dumbed down and has lost a lot of the original precision and cripsness.
1 Do you know what the system is? It is important, not as a criticism of you, but to make sure that we are talking about the same thing.
2 The publication that became Roadcraft.
Road rage program on TV uU|G*dfHK8Zr48 1149Other than as I said earlier, the explanation of it has been simplified (read dumbed down) in the current roadcraft, the system itself has not changed. The basic elements are still exactly the...
-- Mark Foster, Brighton, Suslove, UK PGP Fingerprint: 3342 C02C 7BE8 3FE4 AAC5 8BB2 03B7 9263 DDF2 04C1 -------------------------------------------------- "There are no such useless words as, 'I didn't have a chance.'" Driving, HMSO
