and Which doesn't give them the right to follow at such close following distances that effectively block lane changes. Of course, more aggressive-speed driver-road bully type drivers would obviously disagree.
So, yes, it still remains that the drivers that won't let them in are an equal part of the problem.
Scaredy drivers 4181On Sat, 16 Apr 2005 13:02:44 -0700, "Daniel W. Rouse Jr." Of course it does. The law does not require me to let you merge in front of...
Again, that gap should be large enough such that the lane changing driver can merge in without cutting off the car behind and without tailgating the car in front.
In reality, that gap is never readily available if there is any significant traffic, even if it's not bumper to bumper.
So again, it remains that the drivers that won't let them in are an equal part of the problem.
Bottom line, the aggressive drivers that close gaps because :gasp: someone might actually change lanes in front of them are MORE of a problem than the so-called scaredy drivers. If everyone followed at a 2 to 3 seconds following distance, this entire discussion would be moot. But, the aggressive-speed driver-road bully type drivers just continue to drive in a MFFY manner while complaining that any driver that doesn't drive their way is, interestingly enough, a MFFY driver.
