Plenty? I can think of one of two.
I would say that that means that the limit in question is wrongly set, if it is true that normally a speed higher than the limit is safe. I drive 25 - 30K a year and see a few instances where in my opinion the limit is too low or too high.
Is there? Another poster mentioned such schemes, I can't see how they would be applicable to motorways or high volume A roads.
Better to remind a driver of something, if through a moment's inattention he missed it, than to prosecute him later for an accident he might have avoided otherwise. Human beings are not machines. We have warning signs on devices we use, even though if we were 100% attentive at all times, perhaps we wouldn't need them.
Bloody joke. 625Problem is, law is generally good. There is one notable exception, which is the law...
What 'bland plabreastudes'? I hold it as axiomatic that to drive safely at speed requires more skill and that speed limits are set as a guideline for the bulk of drivers, whose buttessment of their skill may exceed their actual skill. And for the record, I do not present myself as a particularly send driver and would not count myself as part of an elite who can drive safely at high speed.
Bloody joke. 626That road used to be 40 mph from a several hundred metres back into Snorbens. The police used to stand on the...
Inherently dangerous, for an individual driver, at a particular time, probably no. But a free for all, I am sure would make roads more dangerous.
