I am saying that he was allowing the candidate to use their judgement as to whether momentarily exceeding the speed limit in the interests of safety is preferable to being a blindly obedient unthinking fool. Technically, according to the strict definition of the word that is condoning a technically illegal act. Now, for the intellectually challenged, that is NOTHING LIKE the same thing as "condoning speeding" in the generally accepted meaning of that phrase. As I pointed out originally, if Ray had habitually broken speed limits during the test he would have failed, without question. The examiners can not, and do not condone or encourage speeding. The fact that one of them allowed a candidate to think for himself on the grounds of safety is entirely to his credit.
The fact that some people here have a comprehension problem and can't understand the difference is a reflection of their inflexible approach to driving. Either that or it's crbutt stupidity. You choose.
That is what "condoning speeding" is generally accepted to mean.
Having said that I wouldn't explain it again, I have. Now, anyone who STILL doesn't get it can simply f*** off and dribble to themselves.
-- "There are no such useless words as...'I didn't have a chance.'" Driving, HMSO
Speeding is dangerous. 1610Yes. I agree. I've said that before. Yes. I agree. I've said that before. So. Finally you've found the group...
