Yes. I agree. I've said that before.
Yes. I agree. I've said that before.
So. Finally you've found the group worthy of actually making a vaugely considered response which is not "f*** you, you're wrong, I'm right. It's a FACT. Go learn to understand English", where I don't even know which of the many statements I've made in the post you're even disagreeing with.
That makes it a tiny bit hard to even understand what bit of English I'm supposed to learn to comprehend.
It turns out you're being a pedantic ****. You probably believe that I'm pedantic. I'm not, really. Someone said that allowing Ray to exceed the limit during overtakes was "condoning speeding". You said it was nothing like it. People disagreed. You're the pedantic **** that kept using the supposedly "correct", but entirely unhelpful words to make your "point".
As it turns out, you were wrong. I don't give a f*** what you think the "generally accepted meaning" of the phrase 'condoning speeding' is. It's quite clear what I meant by "condoning speeding". I meant, oddly enough condoning (i.e. ignoring and granting a pbutt despite) speeding (i.e. exceeding the limit). I did not claim he condoned constant speeding, or dangerous speeding, or excessive speeding, or even speeding that I wouldn't find perfectly acceptable. OTOH, A GATSO WOULD NOT FIND IT PERFECTLY ACCEPTABLE -- IT IS SPEEDING, WHETHER YOU LIKE THE LAW (OR THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE) OR NOT.
Yes. I agree. I've said that before.
There is no comprehension problem. There is a difference of opinion. You chose to express that difference of opinion by telling everyone who disagreed with you to learn to comprehend English, whilst they attempted to coerce you into perhaps revealing what you actually thought was wrong with their opinions rather than insulting them.
Instead, you spent an absurd length of time typing replies saying "I can't be bothered to explain myself YET AGAIN (for what, the second or third time?), so I'll just spout off a few dozen more insulting posts".
not speeding so OKFour people end, but he wasn't speeding so it's OK. Agreed that the matter shouldn't be misjudged, but if someone "loses it" to this degree...
-- David Taylor