Wrong. You need to go away and learn at a better school.
Correct, but that's NOT what you said. Now substansiate your buttertion or withdraw it.
Like I said, you have a *serious* comprehension problem. He was NOT, as you originally claimed, "advised by the examiner to break the speed limit". You *really* need to get a better grasp of English or one day your wild buttertions are going to get you into trouble.
And at no point has he used the fact that he has pbutted an IAM test to justify it. Neither has anyone else.
Driving safely and driving legally are not necessarily the same thing. Something you are quite spectacularly failing to understand.
Drinking & drivingandy m came up with the following;: Nothing, I drink Coke, Pepsi, orange and lemonade etc. If I'm having...
Drinking & driving 1595Silk It isn't the source of *all* road safety ills, but if you look at the statistics then driving whilst intoxicated sticks out like...
f*** OFF AND LEARN TO COMPREHEND ENGLISH. The examiner did not "condone speeding". He allowed Ray to use his judgement as to what would be the safest course of action in a given situation. Quite sensibly, the examiner understands that reducing time exposed to danger during an overtake is much safer than blindly obeying an arbitary number on a pole. If Ray had consistently broken speed limits on his test he would have failed. There is absolutely no question about it.
-- "There are no such useless words as, 'I didn't have a chance.'" Driving, HMSO
