On Tue, 25 Apr 2006 16:07:43 +0100, Graham
snip
Steve Firth 115Please direct me to this particular RFC. The thing about many RFCs is that they were written *long* ago, in a time when animated GIFs were all the rage...
Fine so far.
i.e. advertising. Which is off-topic.
"Sod off spammer" in a reply.
If you don;t like the charter then there are mechanisms to get it changed.
Ah yes, posting the word "****" often was an excellent form of defence. Why you're a very Rumpole, and not at all hypocritical. But you're wrong, I didn't care if people defended his posting, I simply pointed out that they are you were wrong. The charter is clear and simple *No* advertising, I'm astounded you can't read and understand that. Hang on, no I'm not, I'm astounded that you manage to understand anything.
In what way was that either spam or even advertising? I made the point that if one advert is permitted then surely all adverts must be permitted, and you and several others then proved that you are hypocrites.
A direct response to a request, which as I pointed out did not include a valid email address, in what way was that advertising?
Try to think before you reply. Difficult for you I know, but give a try for a change.
You will get extra points if you manage to make your reply coherent, or even sane. Which medication are you on by the way?
