James C. Reeves
No, it actually doesn't. It was primarily a states-rights issue, AND some trading (taxation) issues.
Democrats were primarily for states' rights in those days.
Republicans favored strong central governement. (The name-thing.)
The Democrats are about as far away from socialism as you can get without being a Republican. Your knowledge of the party's platform must come from some GOP propaganda site, huh?
I'm sure that if you line up a bunch of racists, you'd come to find that the majority of them vote GOP. I've never heard any liberal refer to folks of middle eastern descent as "kikes" or "sand african americans."
Sure, if you want to believe that liberals are more racist, or even equal, you go right ahead.
You're being deliberately obtuse. Knock it off.
No, let's not. You attempted to set up a strawman. I caught you at it.
Supreme Court is out of control 4564I don't see any reason for either Ds or Rs to oppose this. They benefit from it. They are in power. They get the control over people's property. There are a...
This isn't a formal debate. Just because you don't wish to acknowledge what is a plain fact doesn't imply that it isn't a fact.
I realize it's not polite to say that conservatives are more likely by far to be racist. But that doesn't mean it's not true. It's also not polite to call Hillary Clinton unattractive. That doesn't imply that she's not.
Again, by plain, straight-forward logic, you don't have anywhere to stand.
E.P.
