UGroups
Driver Usenet Groups Newsgroups

The IAM and TripleS a reconciliation 383

The IAM and TripleS a reconciliation 384
PC Paul That's not really the case though. I have never taken the view that 'I know it all...' etc. All I have done is offer...

MrBitsy

The IAM and TripleS a reconciliation 385
PC Paul Yes, I think it would stand some clarification. What the Observer did was mention only the faults and I received no credit...

I didn't leave, but if you had encountered the Observer I had for my first drive I think you would have been a bit shocked, and indeed the Chief Observer I was out with on Thursday made it quite clear that the correct procedure had not been followed in my case.

What should have happened was that I should have been asked to drive the first half of the session in my normal style. This would inevitably have revealed a number of faults in relation to the IAM standard, but it would also have enabled good points (if any) to emerge. An overall view of the standard of my driving could then have been formed. Instead of that, all I got was an instant demolition job, which in any event is not how a new buttociate should be treated.

Whether you or Mark or Silk care to recognise it, the fact is that I received a very favourable report by the Chief Observer last Thursday. That was quite pleasing for the moment, but that is all, and I have already said that further work needs to be done before I could face an IAM test with a high level of confidence. In the meantime there is no tangible evidence that I am actually any less safe that you three, so go and have your apopletic fits if that's how you feel, and then we'll see if we can make some sense of each other a bit later.

Best wishes all, Dave.




List | Previous | Next
The IAM and TripleS a reconciliation 384 | The IAM and TripleS a reconciliation 382