UGroups
Driver Usenet Groups Newsgroups

The Right of Locomotion 1823

Anyone else catch the Mythbusters cell phone driving episode 1826
Really? I watched this specific episode twice, and I didn't catch that particular part. What I...

Ashton Crusher

And, I find their usually the first to respond, and always with heckles, buttults, and slander. It's as if their afraid somebody might discocer their slavery and free them from their shackles. One poster, who goes by the name "The Real Bev", after making the typical personal buttaults, nailed their own coffin of ignorance closed by writing:

GM's automatic headlights, again
JohnH Followup: DRLs were changed to low beam sometime between '02 and '05. Has GM...

The Real Bev

None of these are Rights, but instead are just the facts of life. Item 1 being a Law of Nature. Items 2 thru 4 being needs.

Rights are NOT what others are obligated to provide you. Instead, Rights are what others are obligated to allow you.

Also, if it is reserved to the people, NO State shall infringe upon it by Law either denying it or converting it to a privilege. And, as I have pointed out numerous times, the US Supreme Court has reserved to the people the Right of Locomotion Ordinarily used for Personal Travel on Public Right of Ways. Public Highways are Public Right of Ways. Therefore, State Driver Licensing Laws are indeed a Violation of our Right of Locomotion Ordinarly used for Personal Travel on our Public Highways.

And, their having control over our Public Education system provides them the opportunity to turn out a bumper crop of those very same Americans you spoke of above, being totally Ignorant of the nature of Rights, and making their transgressions of the Consbreastution that much easier to get away with.




List | Previous | Next
GM's automatic headlights, again | The Right of Locomotion 1822