The dangers of DRLs 4601Documented observations indicate that DRLs exsaserbate the problem. DRL equipped cars are more likely to be driven without the lights in comparison to cars without DRLs. That is not disputed among the people...
You still missed the glaringly obvious point? How is that possible? To paraphrase the discussion so far....
CH: The average Joe Blow doesn't even think about their lights when they don't have automatic headlights. JR: I disagree. The average Joe Blow does, it's the small exception that doesn't. (So) enforcement (of existing vehicle lighting laws) would be preferable (compared to employing auto systems for the purpose of compliance in those small number of exception cases). DS: Yes, and those laws existed long before auto systems did. CH: Laws requiring auto light systems system existed? No they didn't. DS: No, laws specifically about the proper use of vehicle lighting existed. CH: You just don't like my opinion.
In short, we are discussing enforcement of existing vehicle lighting laws as being a preferred solution to forcing auto systems on everybody as a form of compliance enforcement. It's always best to train people to do what they should do (give them a ticket and fines, driver training, etc.) instead of training them to do the opposite of what they should do (which it what auto control systems condition people to do by definition)
The dangers of DRLs 4599That is a incorrect statement. Training by conditioning is a effective training means and has been for decades. IF something...
I've now come to the same conclusion that Daniel did. You ARE being obtuse. When a person is being willfully obtuse (since the discussion context is just WAY to obvious for anyone to have missed it as you seemed to have) it has to be on purpose for the willful intent to frustrate others. Congratulations, it worked...and now you're surprised?
