The dangers of DRLs 4602

On Thu, 07 Jul 2005 13:50:03 -0400, James C. Reeves

Documented by whom? When? Where? URL?

Then it will be easy for you to post references.

No, it is merely claimed by you so far.

I hate to burst your bubble, but reality is neither defined nor ruled by you. You claim 'this is fact' and 'that is fact' and are unable to post even a reference.

Where are the impartial direct references for all that? Your interpretations have proven wildly wrong in the past, so Id like to read up on all your so called material myself. If the stuff exists you surely can post links.

In a way, yes. Better than not having DRLs and not knowing that and still not switching on the lights in bad conditions.

Most drivers don't even think about things like their DRLs-headlighs reflecting from the car in front of them as you can clearly see from the high rate of 'one-eyed' or 'blind' cars on the road.

I didn't make your point, you just drew a wrong conclusion.

No, you have provided references to a random website, which may or may not contain the info you claim it contains. No point in telling without lengthy research. Unfortunately you are not paying me for this research so I suggest you do it yourself if you want to make a point.

Your buttertions are from thin air, otherwise you would have posted direct links to your 'sources' long ago.

No, you claim that these things are on file but at the same time are unable to provide a reference to them. IOW, you either just think they are on file or you are outright lying.

Neither have you.

I will go looking for counter-reference when (read: if) you ever provide a direct reference to the documents you claim to have seen and thus must be able to easily locate.

If you had no problem you would have triumphantly posted your findings long ago.

I did. Proves my point.

Again, you may want to upgrade to a more modern car.

I was just making fun of you. You need to have your humor module recalibrated.

Btw, if your 2003 GM product doesn't have reliable auto-headlights, I suggest you inform your nearest stealer and have the sensor fixed under warranty. My 2000 GM product has remarkably realiable auto headlights.

No, you haven't. A reference is a direct pointer to a document you are either quoting or taking info from, not the URL of some random website.

If you start a sub-topic, change the topic of the postings. I butterted that you were still talking about the topic the thread is about.

Your humor module is definitely defective. Your nearest stealer will sell you a new one.

By starting ridiculous rants every time I said something that didn't match his opinion - an opinion beatified by his supersized ego.

If you read the posting again you will find that the last sentence of the second to last paragraph was about auto lighting and the next paragraph referenced that and claimed legislation exists.

Why would I overlook being insulted constantly by someone, whose super-sized ego cannot tolerate different opinions?

Not really. Daniel thinks his opinion is god's holy truth. It isn't and his constant anger management issues don't make it the truth either.

Chris