UGroups
Driver Usenet Groups Newsgroups

The dangers of DRLs 4628

C.H.

Why? There's absolutely no logical basis for that conclusion.

Meager?

Common sense, personal observations AND formal studies should all disabuse you of that notion, should you be bothered to heed them.

Who said anything about bane? I don't want to hit anything (or be hit by anything) at all. And if I have a harder time seeing another vehicle, or another vehicle has a harder time seeing me due to improper light use, everyone's safety is decreased.

True, but not running your lights makes you that much harder to see. Surely even someone as dense as your illogical self can see that's a Bad Thing.

Warning! Warning! Logical inconsistency! If you say taillights are a safety feature, why do you like auto headlights? You make no sense at all!

The dangers of DRLs 4629
On Sun, 10 Jul 2005 15:23:23 -0700, N8N Because DRLs at least provide visibility from the direction of highest closing speed. No...

^^^^

Not hardly.

Auto headlights suck and you know it. I see people driving ALL THE TIME without their lights on when they should have them on; yes, including in cars with your beloved auto headlights. Your beloved DRLs have a lot to do with that, as well.

But then again, aren't you the idiot that was arguing that turn signal DRL's were a safety feature? I guess I shouldn't be surprised by the latest idiocy to ooze out of your keyboard. Do us all a favor and stick to subjects you know something about, or in other words just STFU completely. I don't get it; you come across as a reasonably literate human being, but you're so consistently wrong on so many subjects. How do you do it?

nate




List | Previous | Next
The dangers of DRLs 4629 | The dangers of DRLs 4627