Around 7-6-2005 10:13 PM, CH
The dangers of DRLs 4652On Wed, 06 Jul 2005 23:30:47 -0400, James C. Reeves I read the thread and read a few theoretical ideas of how DRLs could be declared dangerous. 'Military "camouflage by lighting"... If it...
Did I say otherwise? No.
Nonetheless, the effect of ANY kind of brakes remains: slowing the vehicle down.
While feedback may affect the driver, it has nothing to do with the effect any kind of brakes have on vehicles.
Hey, there goes another one.
In this case, you claim A. A is wrong, and is soundly refuted. You introduce B to support A. It is pointed out that B has nothing to do with A. You introduce C to support both B and A. It is acknowledged that C has something to do with fish, but has nothing to do with B or A.
The dangers of DRLs 4650On Wed, 06 Jul 2005 23:01:25 -0700, Garth Almgren ... and keeping the driver up to date on the slowdown process. You would be...
Rinse and repeat until someone gets sick from the fishy smell. "Ad nauseum," I believe it is called.
Yet another fishy. I didn't call it either G forces or braking distance, both of which have nothing to do with the EFFECT any kind of brakes have on vehicles.
Uh, no, it's not. The gravitational constant has always been represented by either an uppercase G or an italicized g, depending on who you ask. Since we're in a plaintext environment, G is the appropriate symbol.
I think you've hit your daily limit on red herrings, not to mention flounders. I know I've had my fill...
-- ~-Garth "I believe that it is better to tell the truth than a lie. Almgren I believe it is better to be free than to be a slave. ******* And I believe it is better to know than to be ignorant."
