Silk
I suspect that no concept is straightforward enough for you to grasp.
See what I mean?
Okay, so it wasn't "God", it was "The Creator". What's the difference?
AIUI, it sounded blasphemous in Darwin's time. Eventually, the ever increasing evidence for it convinced all but the most irrational religious nuts.
You have been shown evidence in plain English, and you said variously that it wasn't good enough, that you thought it was hoaxed, and that you couldn't accept it therefore it must be wrong. Now you have been shown hard science and you call it bullpoo.
I've never said it was God, by the way. I have tried to
Are you suggesting that there might be a God *and* a Creator, as two seperate enbreasties? Or that there is no God, only The Creator? What's the difference?
It's not jargon, it's precise language used very carefully to describe complex concepts. Just because you don't understand the words or the ideas doesn't mean that the people using them are trying to deceive you. Society could not operate if everyone had to communicate at a level which you personally could comprehend.
