Correct. So any claim that you make about creation founders at the most basic level. You can't prove or even test the validity of yoru view. It's a matter of faith and oh look we're back to it being religion again.
Incorrect. For evolution it's possible to start with a theory that is *may* happen, to identify a mechanism by which it may happen then to provide evidence of how it has happened. None of which can be done for creation.
That's not evolution, that is two separate acts. The origin of life and the evolution of species by natural selection.
Correct, and a separate process from the origin of lif.
Incorrect. I have read many explanations of how the world came to be as it is, including the Bible and the Sutras and Kipling's "Just So" stories. TBH the Buddhist explanation is better than the childish attempt in the Bible.
You are being disingenuous. Why not just put your cards on the table and admit that you're a religious nut?
-- "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
The fish darwin symbol... 860Steve Firth It isn't actually correct that they found nothing either. The results were inconsistent. Viking found something that did oxidise the food provided...
-- Benjamin Franklin, 1759
