That would be the LLB.
Invalid anology for obvious reasons. How are you harmed if someone pbuttes you?
You don't have a clue on how to drive safely.
It's a slow and constant battle. 30 years now. The public still has voted with it's right foot. All of the control freaks like yourself are throwing a hissy fit in in Indiana because the rural interstate speed limit might go up a whole 5mph.
Not at all. You and wiser keep talking about being defacto enforcers of laws simply because they are laws. What other things are you willing to enforce because they just happen to be laws?
Nothing like a strawman. Go ahead and make the interstates--. I'll wager there won't be much of any change in travel speed. Instead of 78-85mph, I'll guess it goest to 85-90.
If it's truely an upper bound limit, why would everyone be doing it?
You've been arguing for LLBing.
Here you go making stuff up because you can't produce valid arguements.
This is just uncalled for.
So you are going to do even more invalid projection in place of any real arguement.
Again, making stuff up.
Who says I'm breaking the law? I could be driving in Germany for all you know. I could be doing the speed limit for all you know. I am a firm believer in keep right except to pbutt because I've experienced it and it makes driving considerably easier all around.
The problem are control freaks and morons who think they can use any lane they want at any speed they want.
Like tonight's near crash causer. An LLB, he had traffic stacked up behind him. But when his exit appeared, he suddenly found his accelerator pedal. He pbutted all the traffic in the lane to his right then cut accross three lanes of traffic cutting several people off and going through the hashed out area on to the ramp. There's your 'safe' driver you are defending.
