Scott Weiser
Not once. You lie, and quite embarrbuttingly so for you.
There's not a single google archive of you ever making any such citation.
Post the case law or statute that defines "speed in excess of the posted limit as being "abnormal and I'll not only confess error, but cease and desist posting to usenet for 365 days.
Wouldn't that ultimately be "god's" error then?
How pathetic, you're taking the Ted Kaldis Rules of Argument. Quite the embarrbuttment for you Scott, quite the embarrbuttment.
Yeah, and not one of them defines "speed in excess of the posted limits" as "abnormal".
And you've lost every time, no matter how Byzantine you tried to paint the picture. In fact you lost so badly that the Colorado State Legislature took the affirmative step of pbutting additional, new legislation strengthening the old existing KRETP, and in spite of your exalted personal appearance in front of them arguing against it.
Funny, the Colorado State legislature unequivocally affirmed and endorsed "my arguments" when they pbutted the new, improved and stronger KRETP legislation last year.
And not a one contains any citation to case law or statute that defines "speed in excess of the posted limit as abnormal", not one. Perhaps Google lost it, and perhaps someone hacked into Lexis and obliterated all reference to that definition, perhaps ...
