UGroups
Driver Usenet Groups Newsgroups

Transport 2000 versus Top Gear 5394

Transport 2000 versus Top Gear 5395
net: I don't think he did. I agree that skills required on the track can be...

No. *You* miss the point.

They *are* and it is not irresponsible to say so. Road driving is not the only kind you know. I knew you were an IAM member but I didn't realise you were quite so anal about it.

It would also be really boring television and nobody would watch.

No. It's common sense. The programme is not about road safety it's about entertainment. If you don't like it don't watch it, but don't dare try to tell me what I can cannot watch you fascist bastard.

For the record, I happen to think TG is total crap... but it's entertaining and there's bugger all else on at that time. Every now and then they have an interesting article but it's mostly LCD purile pooe. If I want to watch programmes about Roadcraft I'll put my Roadcraft video on. I certainly wouldn't want to force everyone to watch it because most would find it totally anorak dull (and they wouldn't understand it :-)

Transport 2000 versus Top Gear Sender: Spammers Address 5396
Which is a pretty good definition of "trolling", except that you would want to keep your posts to a...

-- Mark Foster, Brighton, Suslove, UK PGP Fingerprint: 3342 C02C 7BE8 3FE4 AAC5 8BB2 03B7 9263 DDF2 04C1 -------------------------------------------------- "There are no such useless words as...'I didn't have a chance.'" Driving, HMSO




List | Previous | Next
Transport 2000 versus Top Gear 5395 | Transport 2000 versus Top Gear Sender: Spammers Address 5393