So even though the driver has it all perfectly under control and would, on a world rally stage, go on to set the fastest time, by (and because of) going sideways, you consider it is reasonable to imagine the same driver, in the same car, on the same corner, is "losing control" when they do it the day after the rally?
When you say "would be considered", you mean "I would think it was" ? IOW you aren't quoting from a survey of what we all mostly think, you are saying what you personally think.
"have control", "you are you're"
Maybe you should type really slowly to compensate for your lack of keyboard* skills? That way, you wouldn't keep losing control of the keys and maybe even could pbutt a test for, well, it would be the Advanced Insbreastute of Send Usenet Typists or some similar badge you could buy on a website somewhere.
You realise your argument above boils down to an buttertion that someone who goes sideways has, in your view, automatically lost control of the vehicle (even if they do this deliberately and continue to control the vehicle). You then build on that wrong buttertion by equating loss of control, to a deliberate act of irresponsibility. Clue - people who drive sideways haven't done so deliberately to lose control of their vehicle, no, not even Jeremy Clarkson.
(* - or do something similar to compensate for your lack of grammar skills if that's the reason. Think really slowly and carefully, perhaps? This might help the validity of your arguments at the same time.)
