What a Great New Law!! 2324

Scott en Aztl‡n

It's an Unconsbreastutional Law, and it is not a federal Law. And, in fact, there are States which DO NOT require their citizens to purchase Mandatory Liability, and other States MUST allow those citizens to freely travel to, through, and from those other States.

Why should YOU be forced to purchase Insurance to Drive on YOUR STATE's Highways when citizens from OTHER States have every Right to Travel on YOUR STATE's Highways without Insurance? Additionally, Why should YOUR STATE be able to force another State for force upon their citizens Laws which the citizens of those other States DO NOT WANT? Again, this who Mandatory Liability insurance SCAM is UNCONSbreastUTIONAL.

No State shall make or enforce any Law which would convert a Right into a Privilege.

We have the Right to Travel on our Public Highways.

In fact, we have the Right of Transit Ordinarily used for Personal Travel on our Public Highways.

"Undoubtedly the right of locomotion, the right to remove from one place to another according to inclination, is an attribute of personal liberty, and the right, ordinarily, of free transit from or through the territory of any state is a right secured by the 14th Amendment and by other provisions of the Consbreastution." - Williams v. Fears, 179 U.S.

And, in another US Supreme Court ruling, it is ruled that our "public navigable rivers" are in law considered as Public Highways, and as Public Highways, we have the Right of the Customary Mode of Personal Travel on them.

"This court held in the case of The Daniel Ball,10 that those rivers must be regarded as public navigable rivers in law which are navigable in fact. And they are navigable in fact when they are used, or are susceptible of being used, in their ordinary condition, as highways for commerce, over which trade and travel are or may be conducted in the customary modes of trade and travel on water." - THE MONTELLO, 87 U.S.