It's quite absurd to suggest that if there is an impact to society as a whole it should be subject to control. That was the point. If you don't like my method of demonstrating it, oh well.
Just let 'em do it 3460OK, I'll simplify it a bit. You are NOT DRUNK, but involved in a road rage incident. An entire family (also involved in the road rage incident) surrounds you while you are...
Rather non-responsive of you. If you are concerned about the costs, leave the unbelted injured to die on the side of the road or fend for themselves. The only arguement for seat belts is the inability to prevent further collisions which cause harm to others. What harm they cause themselves is of little concern to me.
Of course these same seat belt laws and such probably don't allow for the use racing harrnesses and other even more effective measures.
I am asking why there is a responsibility for others to pick up the cost.
The usage of automobile insurance is forced. If you are worried about your rates going up because of irresponsible people, then I suggest you deal with your state's insurance board or whatever it's called on that. A socialized system encourages irresponsible action by some of the members because the personal costs are less. The knee-jerk reaction is then one of control. You are demanding control over the costs people you find irresponsible are placing on the system.
Simple solution. Leave him to die. If you are worried about cost, that is the cheapest one in dollars to the society. Leave them to die. Or is it more than money?
Just let 'em do it 3459To arrest someone is (quite simply) to restrict their freedom of movement. If you prevent someone from going where that person wants to go, exactly WHEN that...
Exactly.
