message
I'm a liberal. I haven't changed my story, but of course I've updated it to reflect the present. Now you have a sample size of two.
UN pbuttes Resolution 1441, which requires Iraq to declare their weapons inventory. Iraq complies, on time, with a 12,000 page inventory.
Bush administration: "Oh poo, they actually filed it? Hmm. How about we don't believe it? Sounds good!" and US invades, anyway.
Liberal story (my relations and myself, anyway): "Bullpoo, we have the weapons inventory, this is for oil. Arbusto II."
Fast-forward a hundred-billion-dollars into the war...
Bush administration "Oops, no weapons. Well, it's still a good idea, because uh... He gbutted his own people! And uh, terror... Yeah, Saddam is actually bin Laden; he's a shape-shifter or crazy poo like that. Whatever you'll buy, that's what the deal is."
Liberal story: "Thank you sir, may we please have some more bullpoo? No weapons? No f***ing poo; look on pages 1 through 12,000."
Republican story: "Thank you sir, may we please have some more bullpoo?" (But without the sarcasm).
Fast forward to $2.599 gasoline.
Liberal story: "Sooo... How about that hundred-billion-dollar oil we just bought? Any f***ing time..."
There's just one thing I don't understand. Obviously the man is a moron, a liar, or both. So why do otherwise intelligent Republican voters continue to support the man? He ruins your party's reputation, wastes your precious money, turns the United States into a worldwide laughing stock. How about if he comes over to your house and f***s your wife? That's cool too, right?
I can only buttume that most Republicans are feigning support in order to save face after voting this idiot-liar back in. Guys, if you want to save face, you're better off admitting it now that you f***ed up. In the end, the people who feigned support are going to look more foolish than those that admitted early on to voting for a f***up.
