Read what I wrote. I said nothing about what it was north or south of lake. I wrote it switched off and that's it. I chose those words carefully because I didn't know if the dividing line was lake street for certain only that it was probably lake street, and it would be place south of lake if that was true. Not being sure and knowing how you are, I chose my words carefully and intentionally. Yet you still just decided I was writing what you wanted me to write. Not only that, but something entirely stupid because that would make for a sherman place north of lake and two sherman avenues south of lake. Talk about absurd. Do you really think me that stupid scott? Stop making poo up because you just want to be an arguementive butthole.
I never wrote it was place north of lake street. You are insisting that I was wrong about something I never expressed an opinion on.
Considering that according to you the bicyclist never made it to sherman ave from sherman place because a hummer prevented her from making it across lake to sherman ave, well, yes. It should have read she was heading north on sherman place which would have removed any doubt about which of the two intersections it was.
Bad drivers: The DiscipleDisciple is a misleading term, as it implies the follower of one's teachings. If these drivers really did follow the teachings of good drivers...
Now of course you'll tell me it's not sherman place south of lake or some such.... But I'll just block that now:
So yes, someone had it wrong, apparently the paper.
