Following up to Cessna172
nope, it was the normal english usages then and still is, language doesnt change just to suit youre views of road safety.
drivers can be dangerous and drivers can make mistakes, roads can have high or low levels of potential danger, this is how the language is. Crash barriers make roads safer. Taking them away makes them more dangeroud, the fact that its drivers make the nistakes is beside the point.
Worst Driving Experience Ever 141Following up to Cessna172 No, its the accepted one as reported by dictionaries and used by the english speaking peoples. Agreed, which does not stop it...
Worst Driving Experience Ever 142Following up to Cessna172 nobody is arguing otherwise. But it isn't the point. You cant have a personal definition of what words mean. This has...
Drivers *or* roads can be dangerous, next youll be making up stuff about "accident" impling no blame, even though insurance complanies make it pretty clear its otherwise.
Get to grips with the language as it is, you can express your views without trying to warp the way we speak!
Try this "Drivers are usually to blame for accidents" wasnt hard was it?
No need to make stuff up redefining what "danger" is. Give it a try!
look, heres the dictionary to help you danger "a person or ******thing***** that causes or is likely to cause harm or injury".
accident an unfortunate incident that happens ***unexpectedly*** and ***unintentionally****
nothing about no one being to blame.
Let me know if you ever decide to start using english normally, then we could discuss driving without getting bogged down in linguistic fantasy! -- Mike Reid
