Yet another DUH! 4691What about making driving safer? Even if a ban does not get enacted,people may realized how much a distraction CP use while driving really...
How do you know? That's not been my experience.
Its obvious. The only thing for which the data is of value is for use in getting a cell phone ban.
You might, if you have an accident on a not-well-traveled road and the next person, and only person that will be along that way in the next 1-2 hour, does not have a cell phone because they decided it wasn't worth $50 a month to have one that they couldn't use most of the time. Meanwhile, U are trapped in the vehicle and bleeding profusely.
Clue - I'm not paying $50 a month just to carry it around, not being able to use it, in case there's an accident to report. I'm going to cancel or non-renew the contract and sell the damn thing...
Which will likely happen to some extent as some people find that $50 or so a month is too much to pay just to have it on the rare occasion that they are not in the car and also away from a landline phone,
I mean, the way it is now, if someone with a cellphone calls someone else with a cellphone, chances are one of them is in a car. That would mean that the vast majority of cell calls would not result in a conversation. I doubt, out of maybe 200 or so calls I've made or received this year up to now, that I've had any more than 5 of them where one or the other of us has not been in a car. Even if I could put up with the restriction, I probably still couldn't talk to anyone I usually talk to, 'cuz they would be driving and couldn't answer. How valuable is that? Not very.
Dave Head
Yet another DUH! 4692There is that, I suppose. But I think the study was really politically motivated for the purpose I stated. Yeah, but that statistic will not be affected by a cell phone ban...