breasts... 281On Mon, 26 Jun 2006 21:47:55 +0100, Brammel Go on then, explain to me how 150 km-h ~94 mph is a perfectly safe and reasonable speed on an...
Brammel
breasts... 282Still got the 4x4? buttuming that we're talking about CO2, since extra-urban pollution from oxides of nitrogen is not a major issue in...
yes but not only the drivers. Better an accident is avoided than blame dished out.
no they don't, they do so for their safety and the safety of others. Same as every other road user.
what if a car swerves to avoid someone, hits another car, both cars suffer damage but not the person who caused the acident, i've heard of that happen before.
the onus is on both but more so on the driver. The pedestrian still has some onus. People who think otherwise are putting themselves and others in danger for no good reason.
Cars, bikes, trucks pedestrians all have to integrate for society to function. That means in some places one being subservient to the others depending on the place and its function. Hence why people can't take a stroll on a motorway, hence why so many town centers are car free. Its not one or the other its a balance which, while it should favor pedestrians, is not a black and white as you think.
apparently you don't speak safety, nothing to do with speed as i've been talking soley about safety and not about speed. Perhaps you've got a bit of a fixation on this?
Fod
