Those mean no more economy. Easier to just say no more SS. Depends on the goals of those on-high.
Nothing like a open minded liberal. BTW, could you learn to post correctly?
Gold. Under my mattress is better than SS.
What exactly is your point? Under the left wing of the effective one party system we'd be in about the same place. The thirdworlding of the USA has been ongoing for decades regardless of D or R in office. The only difference is the spin put on it by the major media sources.
fuel economy in car commercials 4754it At least we're going to get something back from what we've paid to SS, unlike what we've paid to Bush's war machine. 'republicans-are-going-to-take- SS still has...
Who said anything about stock?
The government has never practiced proper accounting methods, D or R in office. At least in the last half century anyway. Mismanagement does not depend on D's or R's. You'd know this if you paid attention. Go back to LBJ and work your way forward if you need to.
Currently the republic is dying because some americans are voting themselves money from other americans. It's no longer about liberty, it's about representives bringing money home. Money taken from other americans. So yes, it is thievery. Social security, corporate welfare, the whole lot of it is thievery.
That's going to happen regardless sooner or later. But you're incorrect or lying since there is no 'bush plan', just a rough outline proposed. Nothing more than the rough outline Clinton proposed in 1999.
Both wings of the effective one party use fear.
78% of poverty level today will be what in 35 years?
So 78% of poverty level. If I live to 120 I might just break even!
fuel economy in car commercials 4752The goals of those on high are to suck as much wealth from the impoverished as possible. Isn't that clear to you by now Brent? Snicker... Once the U.S. elite have converted...
Well quote it then. Quote that 78% figure. Get on it. I don't recall it being so rosey in the reports I read.
Show me where that figure is from bright boy:
Even the simple Q-A proves your wrong: Q:I'm 35 years old. If nothing is done to improve Social Security, what can I expect to receive in retirement benefits from the program? A:Unless changes are made, at age 73 your scheduled benefits could be reduced by 27 percent and could continue to be reduced every year thereafter from presently scheduled levels.
So much for that.
They are not on the table at present.
Typical open minded liberal insulting away.
